Margarita Segou
Margarita Segou
Verified email at
Cited by
Cited by
Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe
E Delavaud, F Cotton, S Akkar, F Scherbaum, L Danciu, C Beauval, ...
Journal of Seismology 16 (3), 451-473, 2012
Faults geometry and the role of fluids in the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence
C Chiarabba, P De Gori, M Cattaneo, D Spallarossa, M Segou
Geophysical Research Letters 45 (14), 6963-6971, 2018
SISMIKO: Emergency network deployment and data sharing for the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence
M Moretti, S Pondrelli, L Margheriti, L Abruzzese, M Anselmi, P Arroucau, ...
Annals of Geophysics, 2016
The global aftershock zone
T Parsons, M Segou, W Marzocchi
Tectonophysics 618, 1-34, 2014
Stress, distance, magnitude, and clustering influences on the success or failure of an aftershock forecast: The 2013 M 6.6 Lushan earthquake and other examples
T Parsons, M Segou
Seismol. Res. Lett 85 (1), 44-51, 2014
Comparative evaluation of physics‐based and statistical forecasts in northern California
M Segou, T Parsons, W Ellsworth
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 118 (12), 6219-6240, 2013
Improving physics‐based aftershock forecasts during the 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Cascade
S Mancini, M Segou, MJ Werner, C Cattania
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 124 (8), 8626-8643, 2019
Machine‐learning‐based high‐resolution earthquake catalog reveals how complex fault structures were activated during the 2016–2017 Central Italy sequence
YJ Tan, F Waldhauser, WL Ellsworth, M Zhang, W Zhu, M Michele, ...
The Seismic Record 1 (1), 11-19, 2021
Testing Earthquake Links in Mexico From 1978 to the 2017 Má=á8.1 Chiapas and Má=á7.1 Puebla Shocks
M Segou, T Parsons
Geophysical Research Letters 45 (2), 708-714, 2018
Stress‐based aftershock forecasts made within 24 h postmain shock: Expected north San Francisco Bay area seismicity changes after the 2014 M= 6.0 West Napa earthquake
T Parsons, M Segou, V Sevilgen, K Milner, E Field, S Toda, RS Stein
Geophysical Research Letters 41 (24), 8792-8799, 2014
The predictive skills of elastic Coulomb rate‐and‐state aftershock forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence
S Mancini, M Segou, MJ Werner, T Parsons
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 110 (4), 1736-1751, 2020
The use of stochastic optimization in ground motion prediction
M Segou, N Voulgaris
Earthquake spectra 29 (1), 283-308, 2013
Seismic velocity precursors to the 2016 Mw 6.5 Norcia (Italy) earthquake
C Chiarabba, P De Gori, M Segou, M Cattaneo
Geology 48 (9), 924-928, 2020
Paleobathymetric evolution of the early late miocene deposits of the Pre-Apulian Zone, Levkas Island, Ionian Sea
H Drinia, A Antonarakou, G Kontakiotis, N Tsaparas, M Segou, ...
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece 40 (1), 39-52, 2007
Proschema: A Matlab application for processing strong motion records and estimating earthquake engineering parameters
M Segou, N Voulgaris
Computers & geosciences 36 (7), 977-986, 2010
Orthorectification and assessment of QuickBird imagery using D-GPS measurements over Paros urban area
I Parcharidis, M Foumelis, E Papageorgiou, M Segou, V Sakkas
Proceedings of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remoteá…, 2005
A new technique to calculate earthquake stress transfer and to probe the physics of aftershocks
M Segou, T Parsons
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 110 (2), 863-873, 2020
Machine learning and earthquake forecasting—next steps
GC Beroza, M Segou, S Mostafa Mousavi
Nature communications 12 (1), 1-3, 2021
The stress shadow problem in physics‐based aftershock forecasting: Does incorporation of secondary stress changes help?
M Segou, T Parsons
Geophysical Research Letters 41 (11), 3810-3817, 2014
Prospective earthquake forecasts at the Himalayan Front after the 25 April 2015 M 7.8 Gorkha mainshock
M Segou, T Parsons
Seismological Research Letters 87 (4), 816-825, 2016
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20