Follow
Felipe Romero
Title
Cited by
Cited by
Year
Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science
BA Nosek, TE Hardwicke, H Moshontz, A Allard, KS Corker, A Dreber, ...
Annual review of psychology 73, 719-748, 2022
1692022
Estimating the reproducibility of experimental philosophy
F Cova, B Strickland, A Abatista, A Allard, J Andow, M Attie, J Beebe, ...
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1), 9-44, 2021
1572021
Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis
F Romero
Philosophy Compass 14 (11), e12633, 2019
812019
Why there isn’t inter-level causation in mechanisms
F Romero
Synthese 192 (11), 3731-3755, 2015
752015
Can the behavioral sciences self-correct? A social epistemic study
F Romero
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60, 55-69, 2016
472016
Novelty versus Replicability: Virtues and Vices in the Reward System of Science
F Romero
Philosophy of Science 84 (5), 1031-1043, 2017
432017
Who Should Do Replication Labor?
F Romero
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 516-537, 2018
222018
Intuitions about the reference of proper names: A meta-analysis
N van Dongen, M Colombo, F Romero, J Sprenger
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (4), 745-774, 2021
132021
Scientific self-correction: the Bayesian way
F Romero, J Sprenger
Synthese 198 (23), 5803-5823, 2021
112021
Dispositions
F Romero, C Craver
The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 1-6, 2014
62014
The Division of Replication Labor
F Romero
Philosophy of Science 87 (5), 1014-1025, 2020
52020
On the Epistemic Effects of Envy in Academia
F Romero
12022
Perspectives on Scientific Error
D van Ravenzwaaij, M Bakker, R Heesen, F Romero, N van Dongen, ...
PsyArXiv, 2022
2022
The Social Epistemology of Scientific Self-Correction
F Romero
2016
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–14