Marnix Naber - Google Scholar Citations

Cited by

	All	Since 2015
Citations	749	598
h-index	13	11
i10-index	15	13

160

120

201020112012201320142015201620172018201920203 19 9 44 62 79 97 101 157 154 7

Co-authors

Wolfgang Einhäuser TreyerChemnitz University of TechnologyVerified email at physik.tu-chemnitz.de
Stefan FrässleETH ZurichVerified email at biomed.ee.ethz.ch
Ken NakayamaDepartment of Psychology UC BerkeleyVerified email at g.harvard.edu
Chris PaffenUtrecht UniversityVerified email at uu.nl
Frans VerstratenProfessor of Experimental Psychology, The University of Sydney & Utrecht UniversityVerified email at sydney.edu.au
Stefan Van der StigchelUniversiteit UtrechtVerified email at uu.nl
Yun DingUtrecht UniversityVerified email at uu.nl
Bernhard HommelLeiden UniversityVerified email at fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Olivia CarterSenior Research Fellow, University of MelbourneVerified email at unimelb.edu.au
Ueli RutishauserCedars-Sinai Medical Center, and CaltechVerified email at caltech.edu
George A. AlvarezProfessor of Psychology, Harvard UniversityVerified email at wjh.harvard.edu
Maryam Vaziri PashkamResearch fellow, LBC, NIMHVerified email at nih.gov
Lorenza ColzatoProf. dr., Ruhr University Bochum & Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionVerified email at fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Jan BrascampMichigan State UniversityVerified email at msu.edu
Britta WredeApplied Informatics, CITEC, Bielefeld UniversityVerified email at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Sören KrachUniversity of LübeckVerified email at snl.uni-luebeck.de
Frieder PaulusUniversität zu Lübeck, Social Neuroscience LabVerified email at snl.uni-luebeck.de
Surya GayetPostdoctoral researcher, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourVerified email at donders.ru.nl
Thomas A CarlsonAssociate Professor, University of SydneyVerified email at sydney.edu.au
Josef StollPhD Student, Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität MarburgVerified email at physik.uni-marburg.de

Marnix Naber

Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Verified email at uu.nl - Homepage

Vision Perception Attention Pupillometry Physiology


Title	Cited by	Year
Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception S Frässle, J Sommer, A Jansen, M Naber, W Einhäuser Journal of Neuroscience 34 (5), 1738-1747, 2014	192	2014
Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness M Naber, S Frässle, W Einhäuser PLoS One 6 (6), 2011	86	2011
Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations M Naber, GA Alvarez, K Nakayama Frontiers in psychology 4, 919, 2013	74	2013
Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes M Naber, S Frässle, U Rutishauser, W Einhäuser Journal of vision 13 (2), 11-11, 2013	74	2013
Pupil responses to high-level image content M Naber, K Nakayama Journal of Vision 13 (6), 7, 2013	64	2013
Unintended imitation affects success in a competitive game M Naber, MV Pashkam, K Nakayama Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (50), 20046-20050, 2013	30	2013
Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: image statistics and emotional valence M Naber, M Hilger, W Einhäuser Journal of vision 12 (1), 25-25, 2012	28	2012
The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry CLE Paffen, M Naber, FAJ Verstraten PLoS One 3 (6), 2008	27	2008
Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history M Naber, G Gruenhage, W Einhäuser Vision Research 50 (8), 818-828, 2010	25	2010
Different gaze behavior in human-robot interaction in Asperger's syndrome: An eye-tracking study O Damm, K Malchus, P Jaecks, S Krach, F Paulus, M Naber, A Jansen, ... 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, 368-369, 2013	22	2013
Improved human visuomotor performance and pupil constriction after choline supplementation in a placebo-controlled double-blind study M Naber, B Hommel, LS Colzato Scientific reports 5, 13188, 2015	21	2015
Perceptual benefits of objecthood M Naber, TA Carlson, FAJ Verstraten, W Einhäuser Journal of Vision 11 (4), 8-8, 2011	17	2011
Suppression wave dynamics: visual field anisotropies and inducer strength M Naber, O Carter, FAJ Verstraten Vision Research 49 (14), 1805-1813, 2009	14	2009
Eye tracking under dichoptic viewing conditions: a practical solution JW Brascamp, M Naber Behavior research methods 49 (4), 1303-1309, 2017	12	2017
No acute effects of choline bitartrate food supplements on memory in healthy, young, human adults DP Lippelt, S van der Kint, K van Herk, M Naber PloS one 11 (6), 2016	11	2016
Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression Y Ding, M Naber, S Gayet, S Van der Stigchel, CLE Paffen Journal of vision 18 (6), 6-6, 2018	8	2018
Speed and lateral inhibition of stimulus processing contribute to individual differences in Stroop-task performance M Naber, A Vedder, SBRE Brown, S Nieuwenhuis Frontiers in psychology 7, 822, 2016	7	2016
How to Become a Mentalist: Reading Decisions from a Competitor’s Pupil Can Be Achieved without Training but Requires Instruction M Naber, J Stoll, W Einhäuser, O Carter PLoS One 8 (8), e73302, 2013	6	2013
Commentary: is the frontal lobe involved in conscious perception? M Naber, J Brascamp Frontiers in psychology 6, 1736, 2015	5	2015
Pupil mimicry is the result of brightness perception of the iris and pupil M Derksen, J van Alphen, S Schaap, S Mathot, M Naber Journal of cognition 1 (1), 2018	4	2018

The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.

Articles 1–20

Citations per year

Duplicate citations

Merged citations

Add co-authorsCo-authors

Upload PDF

Follow this author

Cited by

Co-authors