Marnix Naber - Google Scholar

Cited by

	All	Since 2015
Citations	849	694
h-index	14	12
i10-index	16	14

160

120

201020112012201320142015201620172018201920203 19 10 44 63 84 98 106 158 156 89

Co-authors

Wolfgang Einhäuser TreyerChemnitz University of TechnologyVerified email at physik.tu-chemnitz.de
Stefan FrässleETH ZurichVerified email at biomed.ee.ethz.ch
Ken NakayamaDepartment of Psychology UC BerkeleyVerified email at g.harvard.edu
Chris PaffenUtrecht UniversityVerified email at uu.nl
Frans VerstratenProfessor of Experimental Psychology, The University of Sydney & Utrecht UniversityVerified email at sydney.edu.au
Stefan Van der StigchelUniversiteit UtrechtVerified email at uu.nl
ding yunUtrecht UniversityVerified email at uu.nl
Bernhard HommelLeiden UniversityVerified email at fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Olivia CarterSenior Research Fellow, University of MelbourneVerified email at unimelb.edu.au
Ueli RutishauserCedars-Sinai Medical Center, and CaltechVerified email at caltech.edu
George A. AlvarezProfessor of Psychology, Harvard UniversityVerified email at wjh.harvard.edu
Maryam Vaziri PashkamResearch fellow, LBC, NIMHVerified email at nih.gov
Lorenza ColzatoProf. dr., Ruhr University Bochum & Leiden Institute for Brain and CognitionVerified email at fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Jan BrascampMichigan State UniversityVerified email at msu.edu
Surya GayetPostdoctoral researcher, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourVerified email at donders.ru.nl
Sebastiaan MathôtDepartment of Psychology, University of GroningenVerified email at cogsci.nl
Britta WredeMedizinische Assistenzsysteme, Medizinische Fakultät, Bielefeld UniversityVerified email at techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
Sören KrachUniversity of LübeckVerified email at snl.uni-luebeck.de
Frieder PaulusUniversität zu Lübeck, Social Neuroscience LabVerified email at snl.uni-luebeck.de
Josef StollPhD Student, Neurophysics, Philipps-Universität MarburgVerified email at physik.uni-marburg.de

Marnix Naber

Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Verified email at uu.nl - Homepage

Vision Perception Attention Pupillometry Physiology


Title Sort by citations Sort by year Sort by title	Cited by Cited by	Year
Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception S Frässle, J Sommer, A Jansen, M Naber, W Einhäuser Journal of Neuroscience 34 (5), 1738-1747, 2014	209	2014
Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness M Naber, S Frässle, W Einhäuser PLoS One 6 (6), e20910, 2011	94	2011
Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes M Naber, S Frässle, U Rutishauser, W Einhäuser Journal of vision 13 (2), 11-11, 2013	87	2013
Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations M Naber, GA Alvarez, K Nakayama Frontiers in psychology 4, 919, 2013	86	2013
Pupil responses to high-level image content M Naber, K Nakayama Journal of Vision 13 (6), 7, 2013	73	2013
Unintended imitation affects success in a competitive game M Naber, MV Pashkam, K Nakayama Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (50), 20046-20050, 2013	35	2013
The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry CLE Paffen, M Naber, FAJ Verstraten PLoS One 3 (6), e2311, 2008	30	2008
Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: image statistics and emotional valence M Naber, M Hilger, W Einhäuser Journal of vision 12 (1), 25-25, 2012	29	2012
Tri-stable stimuli reveal interactions among subsequent percepts: Rivalry is biased by perceptual history M Naber, G Gruenhage, W Einhäuser Vision Research 50 (8), 818-828, 2010	25	2010
Different gaze behavior in human-robot interaction in Asperger's syndrome: An eye-tracking study O Damm, K Malchus, P Jaecks, S Krach, F Paulus, M Naber, A Jansen, ... 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, 368-369, 2013	24	2013
Improved human visuomotor performance and pupil constriction after choline supplementation in a placebo-controlled double-blind study M Naber, B Hommel, LS Colzato Scientific reports 5, 13188, 2015	23	2015
Perceptual benefits of objecthood M Naber, TA Carlson, FAJ Verstraten, W Einhäuser Journal of Vision 11 (4), 8-8, 2011	18	2011
Suppression wave dynamics: visual field anisotropies and inducer strength M Naber, O Carter, FAJ Verstraten Vision Research 49 (14), 1805-1813, 2009	15	2009
Eye tracking under dichoptic viewing conditions: a practical solution JW Brascamp, M Naber Behavior research methods 49 (4), 1303-1309, 2017	14	2017
Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression Y Ding, M Naber, S Gayet, S Van der Stigchel, CLE Paffen Journal of Vision 18 (6), 6-6, 2018	12	2018
No acute effects of choline bitartrate food supplements on memory in healthy, young, human adults DP Lippelt, S van der Kint, K van Herk, M Naber PloS one 11 (6), e0157714, 2016	12	2016
Speed and lateral inhibition of stimulus processing contribute to individual differences in Stroop-task performance M Naber, A Vedder, SBRE Brown, S Nieuwenhuis Frontiers in psychology 7, 822, 2016	8	2016
How to Become a Mentalist: Reading Decisions from a Competitor’s Pupil Can Be Achieved without Training but Requires Instruction M Naber, J Stoll, W Einhäuser, O Carter PLoS One 8 (8), e73302, 2013	8	2013
Pupil mimicry is the result of brightness perception of the iris and pupil M Derksen, J van Alphen, S Schaap, S Mathot, M Naber Journal of cognition 1 (1), 2018	7	2018
Commentary: is the frontal lobe involved in conscious perception? M Naber, J Brascamp Frontiers in psychology 6, 1736, 2015	7	2015

The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.

Articles 1–20

Citations per year

Duplicate citations

Merged citations

Add co-authorsCo-authors

Upload PDF

Follow this author

Cited by

Co-authors