Volgen
Hannelies de Jonge
Hannelies de Jonge
PhD Candidate, University of Amsterdam
Geverifieerd e-mailadres voor uva.nl - Homepage
Titel
Geciteerd door
Geciteerd door
Jaar
How to Compare Psychometric Factor and Network Models
KJ Kan, H de Jonge, HLJ van der Maas, SZ Levine, S Epskamp
Journal of Intelligence 8, 2020
702020
Meta-analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one-stage MASEM
S Jak, H Li, L Kolbe, H de Jonge, M Cheung
Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
472021
Meta‐analytic structural equation modeling made easy: A tutorial and web application for one‐stage MASEM. Research Synthesis Methods, 12 (5), 590–606
S Jak, H Li, L Kolbe, H de Jonge, MWL Cheung
112021
Dealing with artficially dichotomized variables in meta-analytic structural equation modeling
H de Jonge, S Jak, KJ Kan
Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 228, 2020
42020
Dealing with Artificially Dichotomized Variables in Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling
H de Jonge, S Jak, KJ Kan
Research Synthesis 2019 incl. Pre-Conference Symposium Big Data in …, 2019
42019
A meta-meta-analysis: identifying typical conditions of meta-analyses in educational research
H de Jonge, S Jak
Research Synthesis 2018, Trier, Germany, 2018
32018
Electronic Supplementary Materials belonging to the paper entitled ‘Dealing with Artificially Dichotomized Variables in Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling’
H de Jonge, S Jak, KJ Kan
PsychArchives, 2019
12019
Why Do Bi-Factor Models Outperform Higher-Order g Factor Models? A Network Perspective
KJ Kan, A Psychogyiopoulos, LJ Groot, H de Jonge, D Ten Hove
Journal of Intelligence 12 (2), 18, 2024
2024
Het systeem kan de bewerking nu niet uitvoeren. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Artikelen 1–8