Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands E Cuppen, S Breukers, M Hisschemöller, E Bergsma Ecological Economics 69 (3), 579-591, 2010 | 240 | 2010 |
Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods E Cuppen Policy Sciences 45 (1), 23-46, 2012 | 186 | 2012 |
Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: The need for interdisciplinary research. B Taebi, A Correlje, E Cuppen, M Dignum, U Pesch Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1), 118-124., 2014 | 155 | 2014 |
The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project AR Ciupuliga, E Cuppen Energy Policy 60, 224-233, 2013 | 86 | 2013 |
Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology E Cuppen, MGC Bosch-Rekveldt, E Pikaar, DC Mehos International Journal of Project Management 34 (7), 1347-1359, 2016 | 85 | 2016 |
Industrial Symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives B Baldassarre, M Schepers, N Bocken, E Cuppen, G Korevaar, ... Journal of cleaner production 216, 446-460, 2019 | 79 | 2019 |
Contested technologies and design for values: The case of shale gas M Dignum, A Correljé, E Cuppen, U Pesch, B Taebi Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4), 1171-1191, 2016 | 65 | 2016 |
Putting perspectives into participation: Constructive conflict methodology for problem structuring in stakeholder dialogues EHWJ Cuppen Uitgeverij BoxPress, 2010 | 63 | 2010 |
Responsible innovation in energy projects: Values in the design of technologies, institutions and stakeholder interactions A Correljé, E Cuppen, M Dignum, U Pesch, B Taebi Responsible innovation 2, 183-200, 2015 | 60 | 2015 |
A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy E Cuppen Research Policy 41 (3), 624-637, 2012 | 49 | 2012 |
The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects E Cuppen Energy Research & Social Science 38, 28-32, 2018 | 41 | 2018 |
The repertory grid to unfold conflicting positions: the case of a stakeholder dialogue on prospects for hydrogen M van de Kerkhof, E Cuppen, M Hisschemöller Technological forecasting and social change 76 (3), 422-432, 2009 | 41 | 2009 |
Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands E Cuppen, U Pesch, S Remmerswaal, M Taanman Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145, 165-175, 2019 | 39 | 2019 |
Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia AD Setiawan, E Cuppen Energy Policy 61, 1188-1199, 2013 | 39 | 2013 |
How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands E Cuppen, S Brunsting, U Pesch, Y Feenstra Environment and Planning A 47 (9), 1963-1978, 2015 | 32 | 2015 |
Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects U Pesch, A Correljé, E Cuppen, B Taebi Energy Policy 109, 825-834, 2017 | 31 | 2017 |
Analysing the past and exploring the future of sustainable biomass. Participatory stakeholder dialogue and technological innovation systems research S Breukers, M Hisschemöller, E Cuppen, R Suurs Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81, 227-235, 2014 | 30 | 2014 |
New future perspectives through constructive conflict: Exploring the future of gas in the Netherlands A Ligtvoet, E Cuppen, O Di Ruggero, K Hemmes, U Pesch, J Quist, ... Futures 78, 19-33, 2016 | 25 | 2016 |
Coordination of industrial symbiosis through anchoring L Sun, W Spekkink, E Cuppen, G Korevaar Sustainability 9 (4), 549, 2017 | 21 | 2017 |
Participatory assessment: tools for empowering, learning and legitimating? M Hisschemöller, E Cuppen The tools of policy formulation, 2015 | 21 | 2015 |