Eefje Cuppen
TitleCited byYear
Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands
E Cuppen, S Breukers, M Hisschemöller, E Bergsma
Ecological Economics 69 (3), 579-591, 2010
2152010
Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods
E Cuppen
Policy Sciences 45 (1), 23-46, 2012
1492012
Responsible innovation as an endorsement of public values: The need for interdisciplinary research.
B Taebi, A Correlje, E Cuppen, M Dignum, U Pesch
Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1), 118-124., 2014
1232014
The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: the case of a France–Spain interconnection project
AR Ciupuliga, E Cuppen
Energy Policy 60, 224-233, 2013
702013
Putting perspectives into participation: Constructive conflict methodology for problem structuring in stakeholder dialogues
EHWJ Cuppen
Uitgeverij BoxPress, 2010
562010
Contested technologies and design for values: The case of shale gas
M Dignum, A Correljé, E Cuppen, U Pesch, B Taebi
Science and engineering Ethics 22 (4), 1171-1191, 2016
502016
Stakeholder engagement in large-scale energy infrastructure projects: Revealing perspectives using Q methodology
E Cuppen, MGC Bosch-Rekveldt, E Pikaar, DC Mehos
International Journal of Project Management 34 (7), 1347-1359, 2016
492016
Responsible innovation in energy projects: Values in the design of technologies, institutions and stakeholder interactions
A Correljé, E Cuppen, M Dignum, U Pesch, B Taebi
Responsible innovation 2, 183-200, 2015
482015
A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy
E Cuppen
Research Policy 41 (3), 624-637, 2012
412012
Stakeholder perspectives on carbon capture and storage in Indonesia
AD Setiawan, E Cuppen
Energy Policy 61, 1188-1199, 2013
342013
The repertory grid to unfold conflicting positions: the case of a stakeholder dialogue on prospects for hydrogen
M van de Kerkhof, E Cuppen, M Hisschemöller
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (3), 422-432, 2009
312009
How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: A contested CCS project in the Netherlands
E Cuppen, S Brunsting, U Pesch, Y Feenstra
Environment and Planning A 47 (9), 1963-1978, 2015
242015
Analysing the past and exploring the future of sustainable biomass. Participatory stakeholder dialogue and technological innovation systems research
S Breukers, M Hisschemöller, E Cuppen, R Suurs
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 81, 227-235, 2014
242014
Normative diversity, conflict and transition: shale gas in the Netherlands
E Cuppen, U Pesch, S Remmerswaal, M Taanman
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145, 165-175, 2019
232019
Industrial Symbiosis: Towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives
B Baldassarre, M Schepers, N Bocken, E Cuppen, G Korevaar, ...
Journal of cleaner production 216, 446-460, 2019
232019
Energy justice and controversies: Formal and informal assessment in energy projects
U Pesch, A Correljé, E Cuppen, B Taebi
Energy Policy 109, 825-834, 2017
202017
The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects
E Cuppen
Energy Research & Social Science 38, 28-32, 2018
192018
Unravelling emotional viewpoints on a bio-based economy using Q methodology
S Sleenhoff, E Cuppen, P Osseweijer
Public Understanding of Science 24 (7), 858-877, 2015
182015
Participatory assessment: tools for empowering, learning and legitimating?
M Hisschemöller, E Cuppen
The tools of policy formulation, 2015
172015
Q methodology and its applications: Reflections on Theory
A Wolf, J Good, S Brown, E Cuppen, D Ockwell, S Watts
Operant Subjectivity: the international journal of Q methodology 35 (1), 48-71, 2011
162011
The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later.
Articles 1–20