Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science Open Science Collaboration Science 349 (6251), aac4716, 2015 | 9645 | 2015 |
Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings RA Klein, M Vianello, F Hasselman, BG Adams, RB Adams Jr, S Alper, ... Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1 (4), 443-490, 2018 | 1084 | 2018 |
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking JM Wicherts, CLS Veldkamp, HEM Augusteijn, M Bakker, RCM Van Aert, ... Frontiers in psychology 7, 1832, 2016 | 845 | 2016 |
Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies. MALM Van Assen, R van Aert, JM Wicherts Psychological methods 20 (3), 293, 2015 | 322 | 2015 |
Reporting guidelines for meta‐analysis in economics T Havránek, TD Stanley, H Doucouliagos, P Bom, J Geyer‐Klingeberg, ... Journal of Economic Surveys 34 (3), 469-475, 2020 | 267 | 2020 |
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis RCM Van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM Van Assen PloS one 14 (4), e0215052, 2019 | 263 | 2019 |
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve RCM Van Aert, JM Wicherts, MALM van Assen Perspectives on Psychological Science 11 (5), 713-729, 2016 | 240 | 2016 |
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results MALM Van Assen, RCM Van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts PLoS one 9 (1), e84896, 2014 | 123 | 2014 |
Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the p-uniform* method RCM van Aert, MALM van Assen MetaArXiv, 2021 | 111 | 2021 |
Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis M Schweinsberg, M Feldman, N Staub, OR van den Akker, RCM van Aert, ... Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 165, 228-249, 2021 | 108 | 2021 |
Distributions of p-values smaller than. 05 in psychology: what is going on? CHJ Hartgerink, RCM Van Aert, MB Nuijten, JM Wicherts, ... PeerJ 4, e1935, 2016 | 88 | 2016 |
A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being S Hoogeveen, A Sarafoglou, B Aczel, Y Aditya, AJ Alayan, PJ Allen, ... Religion, Brain & Behavior 13 (3), 237-283, 2023 | 80 | 2023 |
A new justification of the Hartung‐Knapp method for random‐effects meta‐analysis based on weighted least squares regression RCM van Aert, D Jackson Research synthesis methods 10 (4), 515-527, 2019 | 74 | 2019 |
The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity. HEM Augusteijn, R van Aert, MALM van Assen Psychological methods 24 (1), 116, 2019 | 73 | 2019 |
Longitudinal associations of psychological resilience with mental health and functioning among military personnel: A meta-analysis of prospective studies E van der Meulen, PG van der Velden, RCM van Aert, ... Social science & medicine 255, 112814, 2020 | 51 | 2020 |
BFpack: Flexible Bayes factor testing of scientific theories in R J Mulder, X Gu, A Olsson-Collentine, A Tomarken, F Böing-Messing, ... arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.07728, 2019 | 50 | 2019 |
Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints. PM Isager, R van Aert, Š Bahník, MJ Brandt, KA DeSoto, R Giner-Sorolla, ... Psychological Methods 28 (2), 438, 2023 | 45 | 2023 |
Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication RCM Van Aert, MALM Van Assen Behavior Research Methods 50, 1515-1539, 2018 | 44 | 2018 |
Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study RCM Van Aert, MALM Van Assen PloS one 12 (4), e0175302, 2017 | 42 | 2017 |
Multistep estimators of the between‐study variance: The relationship with the Paule‐Mandel estimator RCM van Aert, D Jackson Statistics in medicine 37 (17), 2616-2629, 2018 | 32 | 2018 |