Volgen
Eugen Octav Popa
Titel
Geciteerd door
Geciteerd door
Jaar
The use of digital twins in healthcare: socio-ethical benefits and socio-ethical risks
EO Popa, M van Hilten, E Oosterkamp, MJ Bogaardt
Life sciences, society and policy 17, 1-25, 2021
822021
An agonistic approach to technological conflict
EO Popa, V Blok, R Wesselink
Philosophy & Technology 34, 717-737, 2021
272021
A processual approach to friction in quadruple helix collaborations
EO Popa, V Blok, R Wesselink
Science and Public Policy 47 (6), 876-889, 2020
202020
The conceptualization of RRI: An iterative approach
P Klaassen, F Kupper, S Vermeulen, M Rijnen, E Popa, J Broerse
Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, 69-92, 2017
162017
Criticism without fundamental principles
EO Popa
Informal Logic 36 (2), 192-216, 2016
102016
Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation
EO Popa, V Blok, R Wesselink
Public Understanding of Science 29 (1), 76-93, 2020
82020
We have yet to see the “Visual argument”
EO Popa
Multimodal Communication 5 (2), 79-92, 2016
82016
Moral impact of technologies from a pluralist perspective: Artificial photosynthesis as a case in point
EO Popa, V Blok, G Katsoukis, C Schubert
Technology in Society 75, 102357, 2023
42023
Responsible innovation in the age of science conspiracism
EO Popa, V Blok
Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3), 398-418, 2022
42022
A model of social responsibility for start-ups: developing a cross-fertilisation of responsible innovation, the lean start-up approach, and the quadruple helix approach
M Ryan, EO Popa, V Blok, A Declich, M Berliri, A Alfonsi, S Veloudis
Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1), 2264615, 2023
32023
The Golem and The Leviathan: Two Guiding Images of Irresponsible Technology
EO Popa
Philosophy & Technology 35 (4), 91, 2022
22022
On the rational resolution of (deep) disagreements
EO Popa
Synthese 200 (4), 270, 2022
22022
Stock issues and the structure of argumentative discussions: An integrative analysis
EO Popa, J Wagemans
Journal of Pragmatics 186, 129-141, 2021
22021
Thought experiments in academic communication
EO Popa
University of Amsterdam, 2016
22016
Argumentative moves in a thought experiment
OE Popa
Cogency 7 (1), 69-90, 2015
22015
Conspiracism as a Litmus Test for Responsible Innovation
EO Popa, V Blok
Values for a Post-Pandemic Future, 111-128, 2022
12022
Revisiting the Relationship between Arguing and Convincing: Towards a New Pragmatic Account
EO Popa
Languages 7 (3), 227, 2022
12022
Farewell to fallacies (and welcome back!)
E Popa
Philosophy & Rhetoric 54 (4), 397-420, 2021
12021
D7. 4 Analysis report of the interactive sessions: futures of farm data sharing practices: perspectives of European farmers, researchers and agri-tech businesses WP 7
S van der Burg, E Oosterkamp, MJ Bogaardt, A Regan, ...
IoF2020, 2020
12020
Thought experiments in academic communication: A pragma-dialectical method for reconstructing the argumentative use of imaginary scenarios in academic disputes
EO Popa
Universiteit van Amsterdam [Host], 2016
12016
Het systeem kan de bewerking nu niet uitvoeren. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Artikelen 1–20