Volgen
Bregje Holleman
Bregje Holleman
Associate professor Language & Communication
Geverifieerd e-mailadres voor uu.nl - Homepage
Titel
Geciteerd door
Geciteerd door
Jaar
Right or wrong? The brain's fast response to morally objectionable statements
JJA Van Berkum, B Holleman, M Nieuwland, M Otten, J Murre
Psychological science 20 (9), 1092-1099, 2009
2832009
Beyond young, highly educated males: a typology of VAA users
J Van de Pol, B Holleman, N Kamoen, A Krouwel, C De Vreese
Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11 (4), 397-411, 2014
772014
The forbid/allow asymmetry: On the cognitive mechanisms underlying wording effects in surveys
B Holleman
The forbid/allow asymmetry, 2000
71*2000
The pragmatics of profiling: Framing effects in text interpretation and text production
BC Holleman, HLWP Maat
Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11), 2204-2221, 2009
702009
The effect of voting advice applications on political knowledge and vote choice
N Kamoen, B Holleman, A Krouwel, J Van de Pol, C De Vreese
Electoral Management: Institutions and Practices in an Established Democracy …, 2018
632018
Agree or disagree? Cognitive processes in answering contrastive survey questions
N Kamoen, B Holleman, P Mak, T Sanders, H Van Den Bergh
Discourse Processes 48 (5), 355-385, 2011
622011
Wording effects in survey research using meta-analysis to explain the forbid/allow asymmetry
B Holleman
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 6 (1), 29-40, 1999
621999
Positive vs. negative: The impact of question polarity in voting advice applications
B Holleman, N Kamoen, A Krouwel, J Pol, C Vreese
PloS one 11 (10), e0164184, 2016
522016
The meanings of ‘yes’ and ‘no’. An explanation for the forbid/allow asymmetry
BC Holleman
Quality and Quantity 40, 1-38, 2006
432006
The meanings of ‘yes’ and ‘no’. An explanation for the forbid/allow asymmetry
BC Holleman
Quality and Quantity 40, 1-38, 2006
432006
Positive, negative, and bipolar questions: The effect of question polarity on ratings of text readability
N Kamoen, B Holleman, H van den Bergh
Survey Research Methods 7 (3), 169-179, 2013
422013
Answering attitudinal questions: Modelling the response process underlying contrastive questions
AG Chessa, BC Holleman
Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for …, 2007
412007
Why are negative questions difficult to answer? On the processing of linguistic contrasts in surveys
N Kamoen, B Holleman, P Mak, T Sanders, H Van Den Bergh
Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (3), 613-635, 2017
382017
The nature of the forbid/allow asymmetry: Two correlational studies
B Holleman
Sociological Methods & Research 28 (2), 209-244, 1999
371999
I don’t get it. Response difficulties in answering political attitude statements in Voting Advice Applications.
N Kamoen, B Holleman
Survey Research Methods 11 (2), 125-140, 2017
292017
Hoe makkelijk is een niet moeilijke tekst?: Een meta-analyse naar het effect van vraagformulering in tekstevaluatieonderzoek
N Kamoen, B Holleman, H Van den Bergh
Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing 29 (4), 314-332, 2007
262007
Poor understanding of allergen labelling by allergic and non‐allergic consumers
BC Holleman, H van Os‐Medendorp, H van den Bergh, LM van Dijk, ...
Clinical & Experimental Allergy 51 (10), 1374-1382, 2021
242021
Allergen labelling: current practice and improvement from a communication perspective
WM Blom, LM van Dijk, A Michelsen‐Huisman, GF Houben, AC Knulst, ...
Clinical & Experimental Allergy 51 (4), 574-584, 2021
242021
Forbid/allow Asymmetry
Holleman
BRILL, 2000
222000
Stemadvies via internet: antwoorden, attitudes en stemintenties
B Holleman, N Kamoen, C de Vreese
Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 35 (1), 25-46, 2013
172013
Het systeem kan de bewerking nu niet uitvoeren. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Artikelen 1–20