Deconstructing Google bombs: A breach of symbolic power or just a goofy prank? CC Tatum First Monday 10 (10), 2005 | 34 | 2005 |
Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level TN Van Leeuwen, C Tatum, PF Wouters Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69 (9 …, 2018 | 20 | 2018 |
Open data: The researcher perspective S Berghmans, H Cousijn, G Deakin, I Meijer, A Mulligan, A Plume, ... Open Data: The researcher perspective, 2017 | 20 | 2017 |
Enhancing Scholarly Publications: Developing Hybrid Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences N Jankowski, A Scharnhorst, C Tatum, Z Tatum Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1), 2013 | 18 | 2013 |
Evaluative Inquiry: Engaging research evaluation analytically and strategically S de Rijcke, T Holtrop, W Kaltenbrunner, J Zuijderwijk, A Beaulieu, ... Fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 176-182, 2019 | 17 | 2019 |
Open Access Publishing and Citation Impact-An International Study. TN van Leeuwen, C Tatum, P Wouters ISSI, 2015 | 12 | 2015 |
Openness in scholarly communication: Conceptual framework and challenges to innovation C Tatum, NW Jankowski Virtual knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010 | 9 | 2010 |
Open Data: the researcher perspective–survey and case studies S Berghmans, H Cousijn, G Deakin, I Meijer, A Mulligan, A Plume, ... Mendeley Data 1, 2017 | 8 | 2017 |
Beyond open access: A framework for openness in scholarly communication CC Tatum, NW Jankowski, PN Wouters, A Beaulieu, A Scharnhorst, ... Virtual knowledge: Experimenting in the humanities and the social sciences …, 2012 | 8 | 2012 |
Wikipedia as a knowledge production laboratory: The case of neoliberalism C Tatum, M LaFrance e-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice, 310, 2009 | 8* | 2009 |
Open Data: The Researcher Perspective. Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology Studies S Berghmans, H Cousijn, G Deakin, I Meijer, A Mulligan, A Plume, ... Elsevier, and Universiteit Leiden. Online. Available at https://www …, 2017 | 5 | 2017 |
What is the evaluative object of open science C Tatum 22nd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy, 2017 | 2 | 2017 |
Enhancing scholarly publishing in the humanities and social sciences: Innovation through hybrid forms of publication NW Jankowski Available at SSRN 1929687, 2011 | 2 | 2011 |
The (mis) alignment of Open Science and research evaluation: addressing complexity with existing resources and context-sensitive evaluation C Tatum, S De Rijcke euroCRIS, 2018 | 1 | 2018 |
Are you being evaluated? Need for new approaches in evaluation practices J Bar-Ilan, F Hartmann, F Havemann, B Larsen, D Mietzer, A Scharnhorst, ... iConference 2014 Proceedings, 2014 | 1 | 2014 |
Acumen Portfolio: Resources for Evaluation of Individual Researchers C Tatum, P Wouters euroCRIS, 2013 | 1 | 2013 |
Openness and the Formalization of Informal Scholarly Communication C Tatum Available at SSRN 1931630, 2011 | 1 | 2011 |
Principles and Pragmatics of “as open as possible”: persistent identifiers as the interface between research information commons and closed systems C Tatum, J Brown euroCRIS, 2018 | | 2018 |
The ACUMEN Portfolio: Accounting for Alternative Forms of Scholarly Output C Tatum, P Wouters 4s/EASST 2012, 2012 | | 2012 |
Portal Demonstrator Alfalab K el Bachraoui, C Tatum | | 2011 |